I just don't know how metafandom *could* establish a comprehensive policy...we take from the meta section of other newsletters if it isn't too fandom specific, we LJ seek for meta...it's impossible to read every LJ and there *is* no community... [plus, I think by the end, we were getting pretty comprehensive, even reading "just" from our flists, simply b/c people who do meta ended up reading the newsletter or were on our flists...]
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-02 01:13 pm (UTC)I just don't know how metafandom *could* establish a comprehensive policy...we take from the meta section of other newsletters if it isn't too fandom specific, we LJ seek for meta...it's impossible to read every LJ and there *is* no community... [plus, I think by the end, we were getting pretty comprehensive, even reading "just" from our flists, simply b/c people who do meta ended up reading the newsletter or were on our flists...]